Tuesday, April 30, 2019

RM4 BILION DUIT ORANG PENCEN DIPINDAHKAN DARI KWAP

Image result for najib kaabah

RM4 BILION (RM4,000,000,000 atau RM4,000 JUTA) duit orang pencen/pesara (Kumpulan Wang Persaraan -KWAP) dipindahkan ke akaun SRC International dan Najib Razak tak bagitau pesara dan rakyat?

Itu yang kita dengar di mahkamah hari ini.


"KUALA LUMPUR: Mahkamah Tinggi Kuala Lumpur pada Selasa diberitahu sejumlah RM4 bilion wang dipindahkan dari Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (KWAP) kepada akaun syarikat SRC International Sdn Bhd (SRC).
Saksi ke-24 yang merupakan pengurus Unit Rentas Pusat Kiriman Wang Ambank, Wedani Senen memberitahu mahkamah bahawa transaksi pertama berlaku pada 26 Ogos 2011 melibatkan empat transaksi."
Baca mengenai TRAGEDI malang ini di link ini:  http://www.astroawani.com/berita-malaysia/kes-src-rm4-bilion-dipindah-dari-kwap-ke-src-saksi-206510

Mudahnya perpindahan wang bilion-bilion ini di era Najib.

Paling menghairankan macam mana orang MELAYU MALAYSIA masih "tak marah" pada Najib bila duit orang pencen/pesara dipindahkan sesuka hati.

Sepatutnya setiap pergerakan wang pesara/orang pencen harus diumumkan untuk pengetahuan rakyat bukan dibuat cara sembunyi-sembunyi.

Image result for habibul rahman

Di mahkamah juga, orang yang menjaga editor-editor media utama, Habibul Rahman Kadir Shah, mengaku menerima RM2.5 juta dari Najib untuk "khidmat risikan dan rundingan politik".

Beliau juga mengaku wang tersebut dikeluarkan melalui CEK untuk anak dan isteri beliau.

Setakat ini, saksi-saksi yang tampil semua mengaku menerima wang dari Najib, belum ada seorang yang menafikannya.

Wednesday, April 24, 2019

PENASIHAT NAJIB, HABIBUL RAHMAN DAPAT RM2.5 JUTA DARI BOSSKUR

Image result for habibul rahman

"Saksi pendakwaan Ke-18 itu berkata setelah cek tersebut didepositkannya, Habibul Rahman telah mengarahkannya mengeluarkan cek kepada isteri, anak-anaknya dan beberapa individu lain yang ditentukan tokoh korporat itu."

PENEROKA Felda, ahli Umno dan makcik pakcik yang sebelum PRU-14 banyak komplen mengenai harga ikan kembong, duit tak cukup dan harga getah jatuh, wajib mengikuti perbicaraan Najib Razak di mahkamah sekarang ini.

Hari ini mahkamah diberitahu orang kanan Najib, Habibul Rahman Kadir Shah, menerima RM2.5 juta dan sebahagian wang ini dibahagi-bahagikan kepada anak bini beliau.

Ketika makcik pakcik tidak puashati dengan harga getah, ada di kalangan kawan-kawan Najib menerima ribu-ribu dan juta-juta ringgit dari Bosskur.

Baca laporan ini:


KUALA LUMPUR, 24 April (Bernama) -- Seorang peguam dari Firma Guaman Tetuan Zulkarnain & Co memberitahu Mahkamah Tinggi di sini hari ini bahawa seorang tokoh korporat, Datuk Habibul Rahman Kadir Shah pernah menerima cek berjumlah RM2.5 juta pada 2015.

Ashraf Abdul Razak, 48, yang merupakan peguam peribadi Habibul Rahman sejak 1996, berkata dia diberitahu oleh tokoh korporat itu bahawa cek berkenaan yang bertarikh 2 Feb 2015 adalah bayaran berkaitan dengan rundingan bekalan kontrak pertahanan dan dia diminta menguruskan cek tersebut.

Habibul Rahman dikatakan pernah menjadi penasihat media kepada Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

Saksi pendakwaan Ke-18 itu berkata setelah cek tersebut didepositkannya, Habibul Rahman telah mengarahkannya mengeluarkan cek kepada isteri, anak-anaknya dan beberapa individu lain yang ditentukan tokoh korporat itu.

“Beliau (Habibul Rahman) berjumpa dengan saya dan memaklumkan bahawa beliau akan menerima pembayaran untuk khidmat rundingan bagi satu perkhidmatan bekalan ‘defence contract’.

“Beliau memaklumkan pecahan pembayaran beliau akan telitikan kepada saya kelak. Pada masa saya dipanggil untuk mengambil cek ini ada disediakan sepucuk nota kecil sebagai pengakuan antara beliau dan saya mengenai cek ini yang ditandatangani oleh beliau,” katanya.

Saksi pendakwaan ke-18 itu berkata demikian ketika pemeriksaan utama Timbalan Pendakwa Raya Muhammad Saifuddin Hashim Musaimi pada perbicaraan hari kelapan kes dana SRC International Sdn Bhd yang dihadapi Najib.

Ashraf berkata ketika itu juga Habibul Rahman sedang menjalankan urusan bagi mendapatkan sebuah tender bagi Syarikat Fuelsubs House Sdn Bhd (FSH), untuk mengurus subsidi minyak petrol dan Habibul Rahman adalah pengarah urusan syarikat tersebut.

Kepada soalan Muhammad Saifuddin adakah Habibul Rahman memberitahu daripada siapakah pembayaran itu diterima, saksi itu berkata, “tidak”.

Mengulas lanjut Ashraf berkata setelah beliau menerima cek itu yang diambil dari Habibul Rahman sendiri di kediaman tokoh korporat itu, beliau telah mendepositkannya ke dalam akaun semasa Bank CIMB atas nama firma guaman itu.

“Setelah (cek) dimasukkan, selanjutnya beliau mengeluarkan arahan kepada saya untuk mengeluarkan cek-cek kepada antara lain isteri beliau dan anak-anak beliau secara berkala. Selepas itu beliau mengarahkan saya untuk mengeluarkan cek-cek lain kepada pihak-pihak yang beliau tentukan,” katanya.

Ketika ditanya adakah Ashraf tahu kenapa Habibul Rahman memilih untuk menyerahkan cek itu kepadanya dan bukan Habibul Rahman sendiri yang mendepositkan cek tersebut ke dalam akaun, saksi itu berkata dia tidak tahu. 

Menjawab soalan adakah saksi itu menguruskan kesemua wang RM2.5 juta itu sehingga ianya habis, beliau berkata, “Ya, semua pembayaran berjumlah RM2.5 juta itu sudah dilunaskan termasuk yuran guaman berjumlah RM50,000.”

Ashraf juga berulang kali menyatakan beliau tidak tahu sumber wang itu dan tidak pernah bertanyakan Habibul Rahman mengenainya kerana lelaki itu seorang tokoh korporat yang disegani.

“Saya telah lama mengenali beliau, pada pandangan saya, disebabkan kedudukan beliau sebagai toloh korporat agak disegani, beliau merupakan ahli lembaga pengarah beberapa syarikat GLC, jadi saya tidak terfikir untuk bertanyakan,” katanya.

Ketika disoal balas peguam Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah yang mewakili Najib, bahawa adakah kemungkinan Ashraf terlupa apa yang diberitahu Habibul Rahman berkenaan cek tersebut sama ada ia untuk kontrak pertahanan atau perkara lain, saksi itu berkata, “Tidak, saya jelas beliau berkata kepada saya ia dari ‘defence contract’.

Saksi ke-19, Timbalan Pengurus Besar Jabatan Operasi Penjelasan Cek Bank Cimb, Edward anak lelaki Innasi Born, 58, mengesahkan cek berjumlah RM2.5 juta telah didepositkan ke dalam akaun bank CIMB milik Firma Guaman Tetuan Zulkarnain & Co bertarikh 2 Feb 2015.

Saksi itu yang telah berkhidmat sebagai timbalan pengurus besar di jabatan itu sejak 2004 turut mengecamkan salinan cek tersebut yang ditunjukkan pihak pendakwaan.

Najib, 66, didakwa atas tiga pertuduhan pecah amanah, satu pertuduhan salah guna kedudukan dan tiga pertuduhan pengubahan wang haram membabitkan dana SRC International Sdn Bhd berjumlah RM42 juta.

Perbicaraan di hadapan Hakim Mohd Nazlan Mohd Ghazali bersambung pull 2.30 petang.

-- BERNAMA

http://www.bernama.com/bm/news.php?id=1719744


Tuesday, April 23, 2019

PERBICARAAN AH JIB GOR



Image result for wong nai chee najib
WONG NAI CHEE

Image result for rita sim najib

RITA SIM

HARI ini ramai mengaku kepada mahkamah mereka terima duit dari Najib, tak ada yang nafi tak terima.

1. Onn Hafiz, Setiausaha Politik Hishammuddin Hussein, mengaku menerima RM240,000 untuk portal berita Malaysian Digest.

http://bebasnews.my/2019/04/23/najib-beri-rm240k-untuk-portal-malaysian-digest-saksi/

2. Rita Sim mengaku menerima RM150,000 sebulan untuk pantau kandungan akhbar Cina.

http://bebasnews.my/2019/04/23/najib-upah-firma-pantau-akhbar-harian-cina/

3. Wong Nai Chee memberitahu mahkamah Najib membayar RM238,000 kepada pengendali Facebook Ah Jib Gor.

http://bebasnews.my/2019/04/23/najib-biayai-laman-fb-ah-jib-kor-dan-penulis/

Image result for ah jib gor


Monday, April 22, 2019

PERBICARAAN NAJIB RAZAK: PENERIMA HABUAN



APABILA duit bukan hasil titik peluh sendiri dan mudah dapat, nak bagi pada orang pun tiada masalah.

Hari ini kita diHIDANGkan dengan cerita bagaimana mudahnya wang diberikan kepada pemimpin-pemimpin Umno di perbicaraan Najib Razak.

Seorang Ketua Bahagian di Kedah menerima RM50,000 dari Najib dan dimasukkan ke akaun peribadi si Ketua Bahagian.

https://www.bharian.com.my/berita/kes/2019/04/555917/cek-tidak-masuk-akaun-parti-sebaliknya-akaun-peribadi

Kita juga dihidangkan cerita seorang ahli Umno ke Kuala Lumpur untuk mengutip sekeping cek bernilai RM300,000 untuk Umno Johor Baru yang dipimpin oleh Shahrir Samad, bekas Pengerusi FELDA.

Betapa mudahnya wang ringgit di zaman Najib.

Tuesday, April 9, 2019

NAJIB TIPU & KHIANATI PENEROKA FELDA?

Image result for peter sondakh najib

DUA portal berita hari ini menyiarkan berita mengenai laporan polis yang dibuat oleh Ketua Pengarah Felda Othman Omar mengenai penipuan yang dilakukan oleh Najib Razak melalui pembelian sebuah firma peladangan milik Peter Sondakh, rakan karib Najib dan Rosmah Mansor.

Menurut laporan tersebut:

1. Felda diarah membeli 37 peratus ekuiti syarikat milik Peter Sondakh pada harga 334 peratus LEBIH TINGGI dari nilai sebenar.

2. Felda mengambil pinjaman RM4.8 bilion untuk membiayai pembelian tersebut.

3. Pembelian tersebut melibatkan RM2.3 bilion menyebabkan Felda mengalami KERUGIAN kerana nilainya sekarang HANYA RM555 JUTA.

SIAPA PETER SONDAKH?

Baca di link ini: 

https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/cover-story-peter-sondakh-%E2%80%94-mastermind-behind-eagle-high


https://www.malaysiakini.com/news/367522



Felda says Najib cheated it into investing billions in Indonesian firm owned by tycoon friend
FMT Reporters

PETALING JAYA: Felda lodged a police report yesterday claiming it was cheated by Najib Razak into investing US$505 million (RM2.3 billion) in an Indonesian plantation firm owned by a friend of the former prime minister.

In the report lodged at the Dang Wangi police headquarters yesterday, Felda director-general Othman Omar said the amount paid to acquire a 37% stake in Eagle High Plantations TBK (EHP) was 344% more than its actual value of US$114 million.

EHP is part of the Rajawali Group owned by Peter Sondakh, whom Othman said was close to Najib.

He said Felda took a RM4.8 billion loan to finance the deal from GovCo Holdings Bhd (GovCo), a subsidiary of the finance ministry then headed by Najib.

“Following the purchase by Felda at RM2.3 billion, it suffered losses when the value as of last month was just RM555 million,” Othman said.

He said Najib had in 2015 directed Felda through its special purpose vehicle FIC Properties Sdn Bhd to invest in EHP, after earlier approaching Felda’s FGV Bhd as well as the Malaysian Plantation Oil Board (MPOB) and Malaysian Rubber Board (MRB).

Othman said the deal, signed by then-Felda chairman Isa Samad, was “one-sided” and “risky”, adding that EHP had debts of US$547.4 million in 2014 and liabilities of US$676.9 million in 2016.

He said the company also had no sustainable palm-oil accreditation, and would never be able to get the Roundtable on Sustainable Palm Oil (RSPO) certification in the next 10 years.

It also said the deal went against findings by auditors BDO Malaysia and KPMG Malaysia, due diligence undertaken by Indonesian law firm Hiswara Bunjamin Tandjung and a presentation by JP Morgan.

Felda defended the deal two years ago, saying it needed “a strong local partner to materialise its business plan to expand in Indonesia”.

“As Rajawali Group is among the largest conglomerates in Indonesia, it is a much sought-after partner not only in the plantation sector but also other related businesses,” it had said.

It was reported earlier this year that Felda was seeking to dispose of its stakes in EHP.

Thursday, April 4, 2019

PERBICARAAN NAJIB: DUIT DARI SRC DIGUNAKAN UNTUK SHOPPING & UBAHSUAI RUMAH

Image result for najib rosmah rich

SEMALAM bermulalah perbicaraan keatas Najib Razak selepas 6 bulan tertangguh dek taktik cuba menangguhkan perbicaraan oleh Najib.

Perbicaraan ini bakal membawa Najib ke PENJARA.

Berikut intipati perbicaraan HARI PERTAMA.

1. Najib didakwa mengambil RM42 juta dari SRC International.

2. Wang tersebut dimasukkan ke akaun Najib melalui akaun dua syarikat lain Gandingan Mentari (di mana isteri bekas Peguam Negara, Faridah Begum, salah seorang ahli pengarahnya) dan Ihsan Perdana.
Related image

3. Wang tersebut antara lain digunakan Najib untuk perbelanjaan kad kredit untuk "shopping" di kedai mewah, Chanel, di Honolulu, Hawaii.

4.  Wang tersebut digunakan untuk mengubah suai rumah beliau di Jalan Langgak Duta dan di Pekan, Pahang.



Opening speech of AG Tommy Thomas at trial of Najib Razak


Published 1 day ago on 03 April 2019
Attorney General Tommy Thomas arrives at the Kuala Lumpur Court Complex April 3, 2019. — Picture by Mukhriz Hazim

May it please Your Lordship,

It is my duty and privilege to open the first trial in our courts against a former Prime Minister, who for nearly a decade, occupied the most powerful office in the land and wielded near absolute power, which carries with it enormous responsibility, which my office intends to discharge in order to establish that the Accused is guilty of the seven (7) charges that he is facing before Your Lordship.


The Accused during his entire period in office as Prime Minister, at which time these offences were committed, simultaneously held the office of Minister of Finance, thereby combining maximum political power and control of the nation’s purse. In holding the office of the Prime Minister, and thus the nation’s highest elected public officer and Head of Government, the highest trust was reposed by our people in the Accused. In such circumstances, the law demands the highest standards of care in the discharge by the Accused of his duties and obligations as trustee of public offices.

Not being satisfied with the holding of the twin positions of Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, the Accused was also appointed the Chairman of the Board of Advisors of 1Malaysia Development Berhad (“1MDB”) and Advisor Emeritus in its fully owned subsidiary, SRC International Sdn. Bhd. (“SRC International”). A common feature of both companies was that the true power in directing and managing their affairs did not lie with the Board of Directors, as is required by law and is the universal practice wherever companies carry on business, but in the person of the Accused by virtue of his holding these two positions.


The operation of Article 8(1) of the Federal Constitution that “all persons are equal before the law” is amply demonstrated by this trial. A former Prime Minister is charged under due process in the ordinary court of the land, like any other Accused. The Accused is not above the law and his prosecution and this trial should serve as precedents for all future holders of this august office.


My Lord,

This trial is the first of many kleptocracy-1MDB-linked prosecutions. As required under Section 179 of the Criminal Procedure Code, I will state briefly the nature of the offences charged and the evidence by which the Prosecution proposes to prove the guilt of the Accused.

In the instant prosecution, the Accused is charged for the following offences –
One (1) charge under Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 for abuse of position;
Three (3) charges under Section 409 of the Penal Code for criminal breach of trust;
Three (3) charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 for money laundering; and

To prove the prosecution case beyond a reasonable doubt, the Prosecution will be relying on direct and circumstantial evidence, both oral and documentary, to prove that the Accused, on the dates, times and manner as contained in the charges, is guilty of each of the charges against him.

One (1) charge under Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009 for abuse of position

For the charge under Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009, evidence will establish that the Accused at all material times, as an officer of a public body, to wit, as Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, used his office and/or position to obtain for himself a gratification of RM42 million. Evidence will abundantly establish that the Accused was directly involved in the decision on behalf of the government of Malaysia to give government guarantees for the loans amounting to RM4 billion received by SRC International Sdn Bhd from Kumpulan Wang Persaraan (Diperbadankan) (“KWAP”).

In proving the ingredients of Section 23 of the MACC Act 2009, evidence – oral, documentary and/or circumstantial, will be led by the prosecution to establish the following –
Proposed establishment of SRC International Sdn Bhd;
Proposed setting-up grant of RM3 billion;
SRC International’s request for a government loan for RM3.95 billion;
The appointment of SRC International’s Board of Directors, and the appointment of one Nik Faisal Ariff Kamil as CEO of SRC International;
Matters that led to the approval of the Government of Malaysia through the Ministry of Finance for the issuance of a RM2 billion government guarantee in favour of SRC International;
Matters that led to the approval of the Government of Malaysia through the Ministry of Finance for the issuance of a further RM2 billion government guarantee in favour of SRC International;
Monies totalling RM42 million, sourced from SRC International, were channelled through the company accounts of Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd (a wholly-owned subsidiary of SRC International Sdn Bhd) and Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd (purportedly appointed as SRC International’s corporate social responsibility partner);
The Accused, between 17 August 2011 and 8 February 2012, as a result of the aforesaid, had received as gratification the said monies totalling RM42 million into his AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 and AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 bank accounts.

Three (3) charges under Section 409 of the Penal Code for criminal breach of trust

For the charges under Section 409 of the Penal Code, evidence will establish that the Accused at all material times, as agent, to wit, as Prime Minister and Minister of Finance, and Advisor Emeritus of SRC International, whilst entrusted with monies belonging to SRC International, committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the RM27 million, RM5 million and RM10 million belonging to SRC International.


In proving the ingredients of Section 409 of the Penal Code for criminal breach of trust, evidence – oral, documentary and/or circumstantial, will be led by the prosecution to establish the following –

A Special Resolution was passed to amend SRC International’s Articles of Association to appoint the Accused as Advisor Emeritus. As Advisor Emeritus the Accused shall advise the Company’s Board on material matters and matters of strategic interest to Malaysia, and that the Board shall give due consideration to and implement any advice of the Advisor Emeritus in the best interest of the Company;

That the Accused had dishonestly caused himself to wrongfully gain RM42 million and/or caused SRC International to wrongfully lose RM42 million;
That between 24 and 29 December 2014, a sum of RM27 million belonging to SRC International was remitted to the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account through the company accounts of Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd and Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd;

That between 24 and 29 December 2014, a sum of RM5 million belonging to SRC International was remitted to the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account through the company accounts of Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd and Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd; and
That between 10 February and 2 March 2015, a sum of RM10 million belonging to SRC International was remitted to the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account through the company accounts of Gandingan Mentari Sdn Bhd and Ihsan Perdana Sdn Bhd.

Three (3) charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 for money laundering

For the charges under Section 4(1)(b) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 for money laundering, evidence – oral, documentary and/or circumstantial, will be led by the prosecution to establish the following –

That the Accused on or about 26 December 2014 engaged in money laundering to wit by receiving RM27 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, in the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account;

That the Accused on or about 29 December 2014 via a Real Time Electronic Transfer of Funds and Securities (“RENTAS”) instruction, remitted RM27 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, from the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account to the company account of Permai Binraya Sdn Bhd;

That the Accused on or about 26 December 2014 engaged in money laundering to wit by receiving RM5 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, in the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account;

That the Accused on or about 29 December 2014 via a Real Time Electronic Transfer of Funds and Securities (“RENTAS”) instruction, remitted RM5 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, from the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account to the company account of Putra Perdana Construction Sdn Bhd;

That the Accused on or about 10 February 2015 engaged in money laundering to wit by receiving RM10 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, in the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account;

That the Accused on or about 10 February 2015 remitted RM10 million, being the proceeds of an unlawful activity, from the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-1MY no. 211-202-201188-0 account to the Accused’s AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account;

That the Accused had issued a total of 15 personal cheques from his AmPrivate Banking-MY no. 211-202-201190-6 account totalling an approximate sum of RM10,776,514.00;

Evidence will also establish that in December 2014, the Accused’s credit card was charged US$130,625 for expenses made at Chanel, an exclusive fashion store in Honolulu; and

Evidence will establish that the personal cheques were issued for, among others, payment for renovation works carried out at the Accused’s residence at No.11 Jalan Langgak Duta, Kuala Lumpur, the Accused’s residence in Pekan, Pahang and cheques issued to various Barisan Nasional component political parties.

My Lord,

The burden is now on the Prosecution to prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the Accused, Mohd. Najib bin Hj Abd Razak is guilty of the criminal charges preferred against him at this trial.

https://www.malaymail.com/news/malaysia/2019/04/03/opening-speech-of-ag-tommy-thomas-at-trial-of-najib-razak/1739387?utm_source=FBdlvr&utm_medium=facebook

Monday, April 1, 2019

NAJIB RAZAK TAK BAYAR INCOME TAX BERJUMLAH RM.1.5 BILION (RM1,500,000,000)

Image result for najib cukai pengkhianat

https://www.mstar.com.my/lokal/semasa/2013/11/24/elak-bayar-cukai-dianggap-pengkhianat-negara--najib

(JELAPANG: Baru sekarang LHDN mahu bertindak. Rakyat marhaen dikejar sampai ke lubang cacing. Orang atasan dibiarkan. Satu soalan buat LHDN. Berapa ramai ketua bahagian Umno yang hidup bermewah-mewahan dan berkereta mewah yang membayar "income tax" di era Umno? Berapa Azeez Rahim bayar kepada income tax? Berapa Habibul Rahman bayar kepada income tax? Orang awam ada yang terpaksa ikat perut untuk bayar income tax. Pemimpin Umno?)


Laporan: LHDN minta Najib bayar cukai RM1.5b

 1 Apr 2019, 10:00 pagi

Dua hari menjelang perbicaraan mahkamahnya, bekas perdana menteri Najib Razak diminta oleh Lembaga Hasil Dalam Negeri (LHDN) untuk membayar RM1.5 bilion.

The Edge Markets melaporkan bahawa bil untuk tempoh 2011-2017 itu merupakan jumlah lain dari cukain pendapatan yang sudah dibayar ahli parlimen Pekan itu selama tujuh tahun.

Sumber yang dipetik laporan itu berkata Najib sudah dimaklumkan berhubung perkara berkenaan melalui surat yang dihantar LHDN kira-kira seminggu lalu.

Menurut sumber, siasatan LHDN mendapati Najib belum mengisytiharkan pendapatan kira-kira RM4 bilion dalam tempoh itu, termasuk RM2.6 bilion dalam akaun peribadinya sebelum ini yang didakwa berpunca dari 1MDB.

Najib bertegas bahawa RM2.6 bilion itu adalah dari derma keluarga diraja Arab Saudi.

Pakar cukai dipetik berkata, tanpa perlu mengambil kira sama ada wang berkenaan dicuri atau derma, ia masih dianggap boleh dikenakan cukai, dan adalah kesalahan untuk tidak mengisytiharkannya sebagai pendapatan.

"Jika pendapatan itu dari hasil haram, terpulang kepada agensi seperti polis atau SPRM untuk siasat jika berlaku jenayah.

"LHDN hanya menguruskan soal cukai pendapatan," katanya dipetik sebagai berkata.

Najib kini berdepan 42 tuduhan jenayah. Daripada jumlah itu, 10 tuduhan berhubung SRC International, bekas syarikat subsidiari 1MDB.

Tuduhan itu termasuklah tiga dakwaan pengubahan wang haram melibatkan RM42 juta, pecah amanah, dan penyalahgunaan kuasa.

Pada 8 Feb lalu, pihak pendakwaan menambah tiga lagi tuduhan pengubahan wang haram terhadap Najib melibatkan dana RM47 juga yang didakwa diterimanya pada 8 Julai 2014.

Najib juga akan berdepan dakwaan berhubung 1MDB pertengahan bulan depan.